<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>1. Speak, 2. Think &#187; government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.punk.co.nz/tag/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.punk.co.nz</link>
	<description>Speaking before thinking since 1981</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Submission on the Broadband Investment Initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.punk.co.nz/2009/04/27/submission-on-the-broadband-investment-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.punk.co.nz/2009/04/27/submission-on-the-broadband-investment-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punk.co.nz/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t been doing so well with the one post per week goal lately, but here is my submission on the Government&#8217;s Broadband Investment Initiative.
The proposal seems to believe that wholesale unbundled dark fibre is the best method to serve all customers, which is absolutely incorrect. The negative impacts identified in this submission are caused [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been doing so well with the one post per week goal lately, but here is my submission on the <a href="http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/StandardSummary____38669.aspx">Government&#8217;s Broadband Investment Initiative</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>The proposal seems to believe that wholesale unbundled dark fibre is the best method to serve all customers, which is absolutely incorrect. The negative impacts identified in this submission are caused by this, and forcing LFCs to engineer the networks in such a way.</p>
<p>Unbundled dark fibre is only suitable for a small percentage of customers and is completely unsuitable for the remaining customers that make up the vast majority. It is important that this distinction is understood, and that the proposal targets the distinct needs of these two categories of customer.</p></blockquote>
<p>The full 21 page submission is available in PDF format <a href="http://www.punk.co.nz/files/Broadband Submission (27 April 2009).pdf">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.punk.co.nz/2009/04/27/submission-on-the-broadband-investment-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
